On Sat, Jul 26, 2003 at 01:45:02PM -0500, Bill McCormick wrote: >> Can't find it in the archives (I'm sure it's there - I just can't find it) >> but I think the fix was post 1.3.22. I'd suggest trying 1.5. That might >> be the quickest solution. > >Yea that's what I thought. So I tried upgrading to 1.50 last night and must >have gone a little to far with some of the other Exp packages. I ended up >with an unusable system
Yeah, the old "unusable system" scenario. It's a favorite of the 'It failed to operate for me' bug-reporter crowd. It's also quite popular with the "My C program gave me syntax errors. Can someone help?" set. -- Please use the resources at cygwin.com rather than sending personal email. Special for spam email harvesters: send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and be permanently blocked from mailing lists at sources.redhat.com -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
