On Wed, 23 Jul 2003, Jeffery B. Rancier wrote:
> Larry Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > It's not a bug, unless you consider a Windows program not being able to
> > understand Cygwin symbolic links a bug. I don't think there is much
> > chance of changing Windows to permit all applications a proper understanding
> > though.
>
> I see. Why does it work at all, then? I renamed my emacs version of
> etags to ensure that I was running cygwin's.
>
> > I'm surprised you don't see this all of the time when invoked in NTEmacs.
> > Regardless, it would never work, even if it doesn't complain. Use
> > Cygwin's emacs, ctags directly, or some emacs lisp wizardry to resolve
> > this issue.
>
> First time I've ever seen it is three years.
What you could do is create an "etags.bat" that runs 'bash -c etags "%1"
"%2" "%3" "%4" "%5" "%6" "%7" "%8" "%9"', put it in your PATH, and you
should be able to call that from NTEmacs.
Igor
--
http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/
|\ _,,,---,,_ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ZZZzz /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-' Igor Pechtchanski, Ph.D.
'---''(_/--' `-'\_) fL a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-. Meow!
"I have since come to realize that being between your mentor and his route
to the bathroom is a major career booster." -- Patrick Naughton
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
