...
>>>What would happen on *nix? >> >>The same thing as on cygwin. > >Really? > >Since Cygwin "strace" is not a Cygwin program, it does not get Cygwin >symbolic links resolved. Whereas on Unix or Linux, a symlink would be >resolved by the kernel if it was used by strace and it (strace) would >successfully get its target executed.
AFAIK, we were talking about "which" not strace. I thought it was obvious why strace wasn't working. strace will translate cygwin paths these days but it won't (yet) follow cygwin symlinks.
Right. My mistake.
RRS
-- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
