On Wed, 16 Jul 2003, andrew brian clegg wrote: > On Wed, 16 Jul 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Perhaps even a bug reporting script that asked the questions you want > > answered, and ran cygcheck etc. (basically, automating as much of the > > http://cygwin.com/problems.html procedure as far as possible), might be > > worthwhile. > > That reminds me about an idea I had re. cygcheck results. Is it possible > to set up the listserver to bounce messages that look like they've had a > cygcheck.out pasted inline, so people (usually Igor ;) ) don't have to > keep reeling off the spiel about attaching them?
It wouldn't be too hard, but you have to think of the people that use (for example, Yahoo) a mail-agent that doesn't care for attaching plain-text. Elfyn -- Elfyn McBratney, EMCB | http://www.nongnu.org/wwwauth/ http://www.emcb.co.uk | http://www.emcb.co.uk/webauth/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] | wwwauth-users AT nongnu DOT org -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
