Christopher Faylor wrote: > I would like a real ldd in the release someday, though. > Maybe the above-mentioned script is adequate. Would it be a > candidate for cygutils?
There's also the old http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/1999-04/msg00327.html , which produces different output but seemed faster. ldd lynx.exe: real 0m9.639s user 0m12.793s sys 0m4.785s real 0m6.832s user 0m10.245s sys 0m3.155s -- [EMAIL PROTECTED], dyndns.org} -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
