On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 09:52:26AM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: >On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 03:23:44PM +0200, Ronald Landheer-Cieslak wrote: >>I just downloaded the new Cygwin for testing - cygcheck output is >>available at >> >>http://blytkerchan.chez.tiscali.fr/cygcheck.out >>af795066e634db97201a98fdb1a974d4 *cygcheck.out >> >>and did this: >> >>$ mkdir c:/foo >>$ mkdir /foo >>$ mount -o managed c:/foo /foo >>$ cd /foo >>$ touch hello >>$ touch Hello >>$ touch aux >>$ ls >>%61ux Hello hello >> >>the bug is obvious (I think) but in case I need to spell it out, the >>result of ls should have been >>aux Hello hello >> >>There seems to be a slight problem with the mangling/demangling of the >>name. > >You're right. I know exactly what the problem is. > >Can I make my usual grumble that this feature was available in the last >three snapshots? It is a real shame that snapshots are so >underutilized. If this had been noticed previously, I would have fixed >it prior to release. > >Snapshots always reflect the current state of development of cygwin. >If you are interested in playing with them, then there is no need to >wait until a release.
Btw, I should point out that I don't think I ever mentioned the snapshot possibility to anyone so I left this to the imaginations of readers everywhere. So, mea culpa. Take it as a given, however, that cygwin snapshots reflect the current state of cygwin and, if you want to help out, trying a snapshot is a good way to do so. cgf -- Please use the resources at cygwin.com rather than sending personal email. Special for spam email harvesters: send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and be permanently blocked from mailing lists at sources.redhat.com -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
