On Fri, Jul 04, 2003 at 12:33:44PM -0400, Larry Hall wrote: >OK, I'll take your word for it. I had a quick look at the User's Guide >for the sections discussing 'ntsec' and didn't see anything obviously >referring to a 'patch', with the possible exception of the discussion of >'setuid'. But that doesn't mean that the document doesn't use this >terminology in reference to the 'ntsec' functionality. My main reason >for asking was that 'patch' indicates to me something that is at least >a recent change, which 'ntsec' is not. I wanted to make sure I understood >that you were talking about this long-standing functionality and not >something new/different.
I found the "ntsec patch" stuff and reworded it. I hope that when Joshua returns he will regenerate the user's guide and that terminology will be fixed. cgf -- Please use the resources at cygwin.com rather than sending personal email. Special for spam email harvesters: send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and be permanently blocked from mailing lists at sources.redhat.com -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
