It did fix my problem, which is the output of some NT console applications, like "net start", is surpressed through ssh session. Based on the google searchs I did, it appeared to me that it was a problem and was fixed, I assume by version 3.5, now the problem came back again with 3.6. Is there anyone on the list can confirm this?
-----Original Message----- From: Larry Hall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2003 11:21 AM To: Arnold Wang Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: Re: download the older version of openssh That's fine. Actually, it would be worthwhile to hear what the result of this reveals (i.e. does it work or not). Please let the list know whether the 3.5 version solves the problem for you. Thanks, Larry Arnold Wang wrote: > I agree in principle that I should have the problem fixed rather going back > to the older version. However, I posted the question to this list several > days ago and haven't received any replies. I need a solution now so I can > have a working environment to have some real works done and the best > solution I can find now is going back to an older version. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Larry Hall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2003 8:25 AM > To: Doug VanLeuven > Cc: Arnold Wang; cygwin-list > Subject: Re: download the older version of openssh > > > Doug VanLeuven wrote: > >>Larry Hall wrote: >> >> >>>Arnold Wang wrote: >>> >>> >>>>Can someone tell me whether I can still download the older version, >>>>3.5p1-3, >>>>of openssh? It fixed the display problem I'm experiencing. With the >>>>latest >>>>version, 3.6.1p1-2, I downloaded, certains NT console applications, >>>>like net >>>>commands, won't have its output displayed through ssh session. >>> >>> >>> >>>I expect the answer to this is 'no where', unless there is a very dated >>>mirror out there. Perhaps you'd be interested in tracking this problem >>>a little more closely in an effort to localize the problem and find a >>>solution? >> >> >>That would help. But in the meantime, I just checked. >>I have a copy lying in my local download directory. >>Can you accept a 450kb mail attachment? > > > > Arnold may. I and the list will not. Please don't send it to anyone > other than Arnold, assuming he requests it. Note, I expect that you were > only asking if Arnold would like to receive this attachment and not the > entire list but I decided I would clear up any ambiguity. ;-) > > To the extent that having this older version of the package "resurface" > adversely affects the likelihood that the problem with the current version > will get tracked down, I've little enthusiasm for it. However, for > those that may use it to help pinpoint the problem, I laud the > effort. > > > ################################################################# ################################################################# ################################################################# ##### ##### ##### ################################################################# ################################################################# ################################################################# -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
