On Thu, Jun 19, 2003 at 09:31:00AM +0100, Cliff Hones wrote:
>>The FAQ and the CygWin mailing list indicated that there might be some
>>advantage to renaming /usr/lib/libm.a to /usr/lib/libm.a.16bit but that
>>had no effect.
>
>That looks like bogus information.  Rename it back to its correct name.

It is surely bogus information.  I can't find anything in the FAQ which
suggests this.  If it really is there somewhere, I'd appreciate a pointer
so that it can be fixed.

cgf
--
Please use the resources at cygwin.com rather than sending personal email.
Special for spam email harvesters: send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and be permanently blocked from mailing lists at sources.redhat.com

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

Reply via email to