I would do it if there wouldn't be 2 "sideeffects": 1) not familiar enough with bash's internals 2) not enough time....
Sorry,
Roland
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 13.06.2003 11:28:47:
> On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 10:44:25AM +0200, Roland Schwingel wrote:
> > Hi Corinna....
> >
> > > On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 09:56:06AM +0200, Roland Schwingel wrote:
> > > > Is it possible to apply the fix mentioned above once to the "regular"
> > > > cygwin bash, so
> > > > one does not always need to recompile bash on his own?
> > >
> > > When I have a bit of time I'll upload a new version of bash containing
> > > that patch. Since I already did mess up bash the last time when it
> > > came to this issue, I'll upload it as test version for a while first.
> > >
> > > Corinna
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > You just found a volunteer for testing this new version.... :-)
>
> What about a volunteer to take over maintainership of bash?
>
> Corinna
>
> --
> Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
> Cygwin Developer mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Red Hat, Inc.
-- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
