On Sun, Jun 01, 2003 at 04:17:06PM -0700, Christopher B. Liebman wrote: > Ok, after some investigation I am starting to think that the issue is with > the behavior of accept(). When the apache main forks off its pool of worker > procs, each one calls accept() on the socket file descriptor. What I have > found is that when the first process in the pool exits (usually due to the > max requests being reached) ***none*** of the other pool process return from > accept() when the next request comes in on the socket. If I kill off the > current pool procs the *first* new one will respond to requests untill the > max is recieved again then as before, non of the other pool procs return > from accept. Any ideas on how to deal with this?
I've just applied a patch to Cygwin which hopefully solves that problem. Please try out the next developers snapshot. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Developer mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Red Hat, Inc. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
