+1 for ant support Now that ant has support for cc I dont see the use for archaic makefiles Martin ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dario Alcocer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 6:35 PM Subject: RPM support (was Re: qmail port successfull)
> On Thu, May 29, 2003 at 11:28:14AM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: > > On Thu, 29 May 2003, Lapo Luchini wrote: > > > This reminds me that maybe it could be cool to have an "install" option > > > in "type 2 packages" that installs them directly, without bothering to > > > have a "fake" local setup.ini, starting setup, let it install the > > > package... this would need some command line "installed package db" > > > management of some kind. Or it is already out there, only I didn't > > > notice it? > > > > Isn't that what the RPM port eventually hopes to accomplish? ;-) > > Yes, at least those are /my/ plans. FWIW, I hoping to use apt-rpm. > > -- > Dario Alcocer -- Sr. Software Developer, Helix Digital Inc. > [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://www.helixdigital.com > > -- > Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple > Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html > Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html > FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ > > -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
