On Fri, 4 Apr 2003, Randall R Schulz wrote: > Igor, > At 06:18 2003-04-04, you wrote: > >On Fri, 4 Apr 2003, Ronald Landheer-Cieslak wrote: > > > > > Just a thought - I'm not a lawyer, so you can safely ignore me > > > (although I am married with a lawyer.. does that help?) > > > rlc > > > >IANALBIMTO [1]? Hmm... > > Igor > >[1] I Am Not A Lawyer But I'm Married To One > Uh, uh, uh! Careful. > He's married _with_ a lawyer. To whom or what is what I want to know. Well, IANAL, but..
I prefer to say "with" and not "to" when talking about my wife because I consented in marying her - and so did she. It's a decision we took together, so I think "with" is more appropriate. However, if you prefer: s/with/to/g :) rlc -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
