Brian Ford wrote: >Cygwin's gcc has an extensive number of patches and is pre 3.2. There >must be a reason for this. Maybe it is just volunteer time, but somehow >I doubt it.
Christopher Faylor wrote: >There is no hidden agenda here. > Ok. But is it "kosher" for me to submit and revise patches to vanilla gcc that I did not write, ie. those that are already part of Cygwin's gcc? >If you want to improve the trunk version of gcc, feel free to submit >patches to the appropriate mailing list. You do have an assignment on >file with the FSF, right? > So far, all of my patches to FSF software have been classified as "trivial" or were before the strict assignment campaign. This is obviously easily fixable by me when necessary, though. -- Brian Ford Senior Realtime Software Engineer VITAL - Visual Simulation Systems FlightSafety International Phone: 314-551-8460 Fax: 314-551-8444 -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
