On Wednesday 12 March 2003 03:20, Ronald Landheer-Cieslak wrote: > The cygwin target is i686-pc-cygwin > > That, and Cygwin without gcc would be pretty useless, so I don't worry too > much :) > > rlc > > BTW: the FSF-provided gcc doesn't work OOTB on Cygwin, IIRC: there are a > couple of patches to apply and a bit of development to be done each time. It works fine OOTB, but it doesn't support the additional cygwin facilities. I don't suppose any of us who report on gcc-testsuite are applying the additional cygwin patches. I hope that gcc-testsuite entries, and occasional acceptance of cygwin-specific patches to the "official" gcc, provide sufficient evidence that i686-pc-cygwin is being maintained actively. > You might say that there is no "official" gcc on Cygwin as is :) > > On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, Eugene Rosenzweig wrote: > > The latest message in gcc-announce > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-announce/2003/msg00001.html says that > > i?86-*-win32 target will be deprecated as from gcc 3.4 (no date set). The > > only win32 target on the list of supported platforms > > http://gcc.gnu.org/install/specific.html is the cygwin one. Will there be > > no more official cygwin gcc port as of 3.4?
-- Tim Prince -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
