On Fri, 7 Mar 2003, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 03:52:07PM +0100, Ronald Landheer-Cieslak wrote: > > The results with cygwin-1.3.20-1 and with the latest snapshot are > > attached. > > > > # of expected passes 240 > > # of unexpected failures 1 > > # of unexpected successes 3 > > # of expected failures 18 > > Thanks for the report. You're welcome :)
> I removed the three unexpected successes from the list of known > unexpected successes since they are expected ;-) OK - I'll update my Makefile at the next release so I get the right test suite. BTW: is there any way to get the "current" or "latest" snapshot with a simple wget? (i.e. is there a http://www.cygwin.com/snapshots/latest...?) It would make it easier to make a "snapshot" target and get the new-cygwin1.dll from there :) > The symlink problem is a bit tricky. However, it just checks for a > non-portable condition anyway so I'm not sure it's worth to fix... Relevant part of output is: --- snip --- link01 1 FAIL : symlink(object, symbolic) was succesful. creat(object, 0700) was succesful. link(symbolic, "nick") was successful A lstat of symbolic (ino:2037236) and of nick (ino:1250805), does not show them being the same ino. link01 2 FAIL : symlink(object, symbolic) was succesful. link(symbolic, "nick") failed, errno: 2 link of new file to object file via symbolic link file failed when expected not to --- snap --- ciao! rlc -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
