On Thu, 6 Mar 2003, Hannu E K Nevalainen (garbage mail) wrote:
> > Yeah, why? I'm obviously on this mailing list, since I answered your
> > question, so why did you decide to reply to me off list?
> 
>  Sorry for butting in... but I have been there myself.
> 
> IMO there is one, not so obvious, maldefinition with at least
>  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> as it is today. In short:
> 
> There could be a "Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]" in the headers of
> mail that is sent out by "ezmlm".
> 
> "Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]" and
> "Mail-Followup-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]" are obviously not enough.
Read this: http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
and see if you still feel the same way.

[snipped the rest]


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

Reply via email to