On Mon, 24 Feb 2003, David Starks-Browning wrote:
> [snip]
>
> Please don't ask anyone to look at this until after .Net Server is
> formally released. Cygwin makes no attempt to work on un-released
> versions of Windows.
>
> Should the FAQ explicitly mention .Net release candidates?
Perhaps not explicitly, but maybe we should have a "Cygwin doesn't work on
my OS" FAQ, which will say something like "Cygwin makes no attempt to work
on un-released versions of Windows, e.g., .NET Server" (to quote this
message). It could also quote the main Cygwin web page, as people don't
seem to read it.
Igor
--
http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/
|\ _,,,---,,_ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ZZZzz /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-' Igor Pechtchanski
'---''(_/--' `-'\_) fL a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-. Meow!
Oh, boy, virtual memory! Now I'm gonna make myself a really *big* RAMdisk!
-- /usr/games/fortune
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
