I wrote: > There is another side to this issue: the fact that RedHat is > not in the business of supporting a standalone cygwin1.DLL, ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ I knew that I shouldn't have touched that one yet...
I'm assuming that the standalone DLL that RedHat IS in the business of supporting (i.e., if you paid them for it) is called something else (otherwise, never mind...). -Jerry -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
