Re: Obtaining a pervious version

[Karl M]

Hi Chris...

Doesn't sound very mean...tsk tsk tsk

...Karl

From: John Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Obtaining a pervious version
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 12:30:00 +1000

Christopher Faylor wrote:

On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 11:46:24AM +1000, John Williams wrote:

Well a postscript to yesterday's discussion - today I went through all of the Xygwin binary utilities with a hex editor, changed all references of xygwin1.dll -> cygwin1.dll, and blow me down if it didn't fix the problems!

Glad to hear this.  I was wondering if there was going to be some
niggling detail which would make this infeasible.

There may be, but it's obscure enough that I haven't found it yet. It may bite me later, but for now my linux port is back on track.

I don't remember who here suggested it,

*ahem*  :-)

Credit where credit's due!  Thanks Chris!

John



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

_________________________________________________________________
Help STOP SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail


--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/