bChristopher Faylor wrote: > On Sat, Feb 15, 2003 at 12:35:56PM -0700, Roger Sayle wrote: >> I apologise if this is the wrong list to report bugs. I have >> searched the archive and haven't been able to find a reference to >> mempcpy. > > As you have discovered, mempcpy is not provided. If a configure > script detects it, the configure script is broken.
As he said, his configure script correctly decides #undef HAVE_MEMPCPY But then the source tries to define its own replacement mempcpy - but it can't, because that clashes with Cygwin's headers. So this really is Cygwin's fault. Max. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
