On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 07:34:30PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Sat, Feb 15, 2003 at 09:42:19AM +1100, Robert Collins wrote: > >On Sat, 2003-02-15 at 08:59, Christopher Faylor wrote: > >>I suppose so, but, again, it seems like many people *recently* are > >>unaware of the setup program entirely. > > > >Hmm, I think we should add a new screen to setup.exe. > > > >After the install completes.. > > > >"Your cygwin install is now ready to use. Please run setup.exe again > >if you want to Install new packages, Remove installed packages, or > >Update your install with the latest versions of your installed > >packages." > > I like it. Apparently it is extremely confusing to many people that running > "setup.exe" again is how you update your system, Microsoft conventions not > withstanding.
So... hey, why is it called "setup"? Isn't it, in the first place the "Cygwin Package Manager"? "cpm"? Even the suffix of the archive files could be cpm... Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Developer mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Red Hat, Inc. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
