Bart - I am using JNI, so I compile the C++ stuff with g++ 3.2.2 and I compile the java stuff with J2SDK 1.4.1. Then, they can magically talk to each other so I can hook up my legacy code to java, RMI, Jini, JDBC, etc. The Java stuff runs in Sun's JRE 1.4.1 and calls the C++ code through the JNI. I also have callbacks from the C++ code into Java objects running in the JVM.
So, in response to the question "Are you or aren't you compiling your java program to a native executable??", the answer is a resounding "Yes". Alan Thompson P.S. My apologies if the JNI part didn't quite leap out in my first message....it was a followup to a previous thread about <iostream> and JNI with g++ 3.2. P.P.S. I hadn't thought about compiling Java to a native executable. I'll have to think about that for future projects, perhaps. At 07:19 PM 2/12/2003 +0100, Bart Lamot wrote: >Allen, > >Are you or aren't you compiling your java program to a native executable?? >Because if you are the I don't get the Sun 1.4.1 remark... >If you aren't (and thus are using gcj just to compile to class files and use a JRE to >run) i don't get why u are doing this if u stick with Sun..... > >I am lost....but am i clear? > >Grtz, >Bart -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
