Brian Ford wrote: > On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, Max Bowsher wrote: >> Yep. It's impossible to fully represent an ACL in traditional Unix >> permissions. >> > That's fine. > >>> Trying to execute make in bash via PATH for other users results in >>> make not found. But, trying to execute /usr/bin/make works fine for >>> them. >>> >>> Can someone please help? Thanks. >> >> Options: >> - Disable ntsec >> - chown/chmod everything >> >> Future versions of setup will set the group to either Administrators >> or Users, which should allow more of the ACL to show in the mode >> bits. >> > I strongly vote for Users.
Actually, the currently proposed patch decides based on the group membership of the user running setup. But it might be better for this to be a choosable option. > Please yell loudly when this future version appears. It should be in the next version. Whenever that is. Probably soon-ish, but only probably, and stress on the *ish*. > Why are shells and such confused by this, though? Well, that scan PATH, looking for executables.... and if file they see isn't executable, they ignore it. Max. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
