Ken Brown via Cygwin writes: > On 2/11/2025 4:03 PM, Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin wrote: >> Ken, check the source or configury of your package. It looks weird that >> this function should be called architecture-independently. > Thanks for the suggestion. It's actually not called > architecture-independently, but the code was convoluted and I didn't > see at first what was going on. It turns out that I just had to add > "#if !defined(__CYGWIN__)" at the right place and the build succeeded.
It still seems wierd and brittle to hinge this decision on a platform macro rather than a test result from configury. Even platforms that support this (or any other optional feature) in principle need not always enable it. Regards, Achim. -- +<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+ Factory and User Sound Singles for Waldorf rackAttack: http://Synth.Stromeko.net/Downloads.html#WaldorfSounds -- Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: https://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: https://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
