Mark Liam Brown via Cygwin wrote:
On Mon, Sep 16, 2024 at 11:51 AM Christian Franke via Cygwin
<cygwin@cygwin.com> wrote:
Christian Franke via Cygwin wrote:
Thomas Wolff via Cygwin wrote:
Am 15.09.2024 um 20:15 schrieb Thomas Wolff via Cygwin:
Am 15.09.2024 um 19:47 schrieb Christian Franke via Cygwin:
If a file name contains an invalid (truncated) UTF-8 sequence, open()
does not refuse to create the file. Later readdir() returns a
different name which could not be used to access the file.

Testcase with U+1F321 (Thermometer):

$ uname -r
3.5.4-1.x86_64

$ printf $'\U0001F321' | od -A none -t x1
  f0 9f 8c a1

$ touch 'file1-'$'\xf0\x9f\x8c\xa1''.ext'

$ touch 'file2-'$'\xf0\x9f\x8c''.ext'

$ touch 'file3-'$'\xf0\x9f\x8c'

$ ls -1
ls: cannot access 'file2-.?ext': No such file or directory
ls: cannot access 'file3-': No such file or directory
'file1-'$'\360\237\214\241''.ext'
file2-.?ext
file3-
I don't reproduce this.
Yes, sorry, the above 'ls' was actually aliased to 'ls --color=auto'
which needs to call stat(). Plain 'ls' does not, so the errors do not
occur then.


While the file name gets mangled, all resulting file names are valid
and
listed:
In file2 the sequence is turned into U+17B3 but exchanged with the dot.
In file3 the same sequence is just dropped.
$ ls -1|cat
file1-🌡.ext
file2-.ឳext
file3-

However, ls file2* fails, as does ls *.
On the other hand, ls file3- fails too, so some mapping error occurs
internally.
Also, the files cannot be deleted from cygwin (need to use cmd).
'rm' using the original names works for file2-..., but not for file3-...

$ rm -v 'file2-'$'\xf0\x9f\x8c''.ext'
removed 'file2-'$'\360\237\214''.ext'

$ rm -v 'file3-'$'\xf0\x9f\x8c'
rm: cannot remove 'file3-'$'\360\237\214': No such file or directory

Further tests suggest that the problem only occurs with:
- incomplete 4 byte UTF-8 sequences (Unicode above 16 bit)
- complete but invalid 3 byte UTF-8 sequences which encode the UTF-16
'high surrogate' range (0xD800..0xDBFF).
Makes perfect sense, the Windows kernel uses UTF16 internally.


Yes, but Cygwin does not provide consistent forward/reverse UTF-8 <-> UTF-16 mappings. This makes no sense:

$ touch 'file-'$'\xed\xa0\x80''.ext'  # creates L"file-\xD800.ext" on NTFS

$ strace ls -F
...
... fhandler_disk_file::readdir: 0 = readdir(...) (L"file-\xD800.ext" > "file-\xE2\x9E\xB3.ext")
...
 ... stat_worker: -1 = (\??\C:\cygwin64\tmp\file-?.ext,...)
...
ls: cannot access 'file-?.ext': No such file or directory
file-?.ext

$ rm -v 'file-'$'\xed\xa0\x80''.ext'
removed 'file-'$'\355\240\200''.ext'

The UTF-8 sequence returned by readdir() decodes to U+27B3 (White-Feathered Rightwards Arrow).


This could be fixed by handling UTF-8 of the surrogate range similar to other invalid sequences: Map each invalid byte to unicode range U+FF80 to U+FFFF. This works as expected if the above UTF-8 sequence is truncated:

$ touch 'file-'$'\xed\xa0''.ext' # creates L"file-\xF0ED\xF0A0.ext" on NTFS

$ ls -F
'file-'$'\355\240''.ext'

--
Regards,
Christian


--
Problem reports:      https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                  https://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:        https://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:     https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

Reply via email to