On Feb 20 21:39, Jeremy Drake via Cygwin wrote: > On Tue, 20 Feb 2024, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > > On Feb 19 21:41, Jeremy Drake via Cygwin wrote: > > > 1) is there actually a good reason that _cygheap_start is in the .rsrc and > > > not the .cygheap section? > > > > As you know we got rid of this way to define the cygheap, but > > _cygheap_start was just defined this way so it's the address marking > > the start address of the cygheap. > > > > It was just the way it was. It's probably just as well to move > > > > _SYM (_cygheap_start) = .; > > > > to the begining of the .cygheap section. Did you try? > > I hadn't; I have now and it seems to work fine.
I'm glad to read that. > I basically assumed there > was some reason I wasn't aware of for putting it in the .rsrc section, so > focused more on trying to figure out how to get binutils to clear the > readonly section flag. When I couldn't figure that out, I figured I'd ask > here both about the "institutional knowledge" if there was a known reason > why it needed to be in the .rsrc section and because I figured some people > knowledgable in binutils pe stuff might also read this and be able to give > me another idea on making the .rsrc section read/write again if it did > need to stay in that section. I think there was some historical reason to put in .rsrc, or rather, into the section preceeding .cygheap, but I don't remember what it was. Might have had something to do with stripping the cygwin DLL or some such... Corinna -- Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: https://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: https://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
