> that it matters at all, I'd like to +1 the suggestion/request of picking up > support for > setproctitle(3) in the next available release.
>> in which case I'd prefer to implement this via setproctitle(3), given >> this API exists on BSD and Linux. Well, I don't think setproctitle(3) exists on Linux everywhere (at least not on the version that we have around here), but I second that adding it to Cygwin would be beneficial, regardless. prctl(PR_SET_NAME) exists on Linux but is very limited, so we can't even use it for our purposes... We do a hack of modifying the argv[] array, in a way different than Cygwin's, though. Anton Lavrentiev Contractor NIH/NLM/NCBI -- Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: https://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: https://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
