> For instance: Getting rid of .lnk files isn't easy with backward 
>compatibility in mind.
screw backward compatability! :)Why carry around bandaids on bandaids for an OS 
that is 10 years out of support?
Obviously not ripe for 3.6 or maybe even 3.7, but at some point we should just 
put a stick in the sand and say this .lnk crap is dead and you have to either 
compile it back in with an IFDEF or a CYGWIN var. And while we're at it use 
OS-native links instead of Junctions. I'm not sure how that came about but 
Junctions are unhelpful.


-- 
Problem reports:      https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                  https://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:        https://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:     https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

Reply via email to