Hello Duncan, Interesting branch to take -- I have not checked it myself but there are claims that DWARF-4 (has to be written this way too in options) is Turing-Complete -- but no, still the same in terms of information available -- which starts to look seriously strange.
Kind Regards Ariel Burbaickij On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 2:13 AM Duncan Roe <duncan_...@optusnet.com.au> wrote: > Hi Ariel, > > On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 12:38:49AM +0200, Ariel Burbaickij wrote: > > Hello list, > > any idea why private variables from C++ source files are not included > into > > symbols list with -g3 and -ggdb compilation settings in gcc version > 11.3.0 > > under Cygwin. Like that, roughly: > > > > grep isInProgress * > > > > <file_name>: bool isInProgress; > > > > $nm -Cal <file_name_of_executable>|grep isInProgress > > $ > > > > So, watchpoints obviously do not work. Why is it like this ? > > > > Kind Regards > > Ariel Burbaickij > > > I had a similar problem with -g3 -ggdb: macros were not recognised. > > Using -g3 -gdwarf4 fixed that for me. > > IIUC -ggdb is supposed to select the optimum debug format for gdb. It may > be a > bug that it no longer does. > > HTH, > > Cheers ... Duncan. > > -- > Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html > FAQ: https://cygwin.com/faq/ > Documentation: https://cygwin.com/docs.html > Unsubscribe info: https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple > -- Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: https://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: https://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
