On Jan 21 08:57, cyg...@kosowsky.org wrote: > Hi Corinna, > I found another file with ACLs that fail even under the new snapshot > cygwin1.dll. > > #getfacl setup.ilg > # file: setup.ilg > # owner: Administrators > # group: None > getfacl: setup.ilg: Invalid argument > > #icacls.exe setup.ilg > setup.ilg NT SERVICE\TrustedInstaller:(I)(F) > NT SERVICE\TrustedInstaller:(I)(CI)(IO)(F) > NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM:(I)(F) > NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM:(I)(OI)(CI)(IO)(F) > BUILTIN\Administrators:(I)(F) > BUILTIN\Administrators:(I)(OI)(CI)(IO)(F) > BUILTIN\Users:(I)(RX) > BUILTIN\Users:(I)(OI)(CI)(IO)(GR,GE) > CREATOR OWNER:(I)(OI)(CI)(IO)(F) > > #icacls.exe setup.ilg /save setup.acl > #cat setup.acl > setup.ilg > D:(A;ID;FA;;;S-1-5-80-956008885-3418522649-1831038044-1853292631-2271478464)(A;CIIOID;GA;;;S-1-5-80-956008885-3418522649-1831038044-1853292631-2271478464)(A;ID;FA;;;SY)(A;OICIIOID;GA;;;SY)(A;ID;FA;;;BA)(A;OICIIOID;GA;;;BA)(A;ID;0x1200a9;;;BU)(A;OICIIOID;GXGR;;;BU)(A;OICIIOID;GA;;;CO) > > ------------- > Any thoughts on what might be wrong here?
Again, the permissions don't make sense. However, that's no good reason for Cygwin to bail out like this. I found the culprit, the core function was still setting a certain indicator value for default ACEs even on files. I pushed a patch and created new developer snapshots. Thanks, Corinna -- Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: https://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: https://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
