On Oct 14 16:57, Mario Emmenlauer wrote: > On 14.10.20 13:50, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > On Oct 14 11:06, Mario Emmenlauer wrote: > >> On 14.10.20 10:28, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > >>> Actually, not really. It's weird in fact, given ls(1) shows the > >>> desired result. That would point to a bug in access(2), but there's > >>> no special code in access(2) for NFS. For filesystems not supporting > >>> ACLs (FAT, NFS, etc), it calls stat(2) and checks the st_mode bits > >>> against the requested access(2) mode based on the uid/gid of the > >>> caller, simple as that. > >> > >> Hmm, now that you mention it, I just coincidentally found an issue > >> with the `_stat` call in Microsoft Windows 2004 update. In the Apache > > > > This is entirely unrelated. We're talking about Cygwin stat(2), > > not msvcrt.dll _stat(). Different source, different call. > > Yes, but Cygwin stat is implemented based on the Win32 posix layer too, > or not?
No, Cygwin is using the NT layer functions to access filesystems. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Cygwin Maintainer -- Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: https://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: https://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
