On 4/7/20 12:57 AM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: > On Mon, 2020-04-06 at 23:55 +0000, JonY via Cygwin wrote: >> On 4/6/20 10:07 AM, Jan Nijtmans via Cygwin wrote: >>> Ping. >>> >>> Would it be possible to release a version of mingw64-i686-binutils with the >>> same patch as done for binutils-2.34+1git.de9c1b7cfe-1? I suspect >>> this would resolve the problem described here. >> >> Can you please report this issue to the binutils mailing list? I am >> unfamiliar with the binutils internals to know what exactly went wrong. > > JonY, > > I think the relevant differences after 2.34 were PR24511 and PR25447, > which are already fixed upstream: > > https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commitdiff;h=40bfb9762747f8336b17c70a0173d10200fa62eb > https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commitdiff;h=82f439d028c65663a0baf0a17ef5c4a2ea5c84a7 > > Adding those as patches to 2.34 should fix the issue without having to > resort to a git snapshot. >
OK, I'll see about using those 2 patches over the weekends.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: https://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: https://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
