On 2020-01-25 09:55, Marco Atzeri wrote: > Hi All, > I have recently released Octave 5.1.0 > > https://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-announce/2020-01/msg00010.html > https://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-announce/2020-01/msg00011.html > > that I built and packaged around 28 of December without > any compilation and test issue. > > Than I passed to build the next version and started to see > unexpected segfault during the package test. > Trying to investigate I rebuilt the 5.1.0 and now I see also > there the same thing: > > libinterp/corefcn/file-io.cc-tst ...............................fatal: > caught > signal Segmentation fault -- stopping myself... > /bin/sh: line 1: 3771 Segmentation fault (core dumped) /bin/sh > ../run-octave --norc --silent --no-history -p > /cygdrive/d/cyg_pub/devel/octave/prova_311_510/octave-5.1.0-2.x86_64/build/test/mex > /cygdrive/d/cyg_pub/devel/octave/prova_311_510/octave-5.1.0-2.x86_64/src/octave-5.1.0/test/fntests.m > /cygdrive/d/cyg_pub/devel/octave/prova_311_510/octave-5.1.0-2.x86_64/src/octave-5.1.0/test > > make[3]: *** [Makefile:31176: check-local] Error 139 > > > I do not see any new cygwin package released in the last month that I > installed that could cause the simple file tests to fail > > %!test > %! f = tempname (); > %! fid = fopen (f, "w+"); > %! fprintf (fid, "1\n2\n3\n4\n5\n6"); > %! fseek (fid, 0, "bof"); > %! c = textscan (fid, "%f %f", 2); <- here comes the segfault > > I also tried the cygwin release 3.1.1 and 2020-01-14 snapshot > in addition to the 3.1.2 to see if something different was > coming with no difference in the outcome. > > Now I am seriously thinking about BLODA, but I have not > noted any difference from the two AVs I was using > Antivir and MS Defender, so I am wandering if last > update for W10 Home x64 is the culprit.
Also what W10 feature release YYMM and/or build NNNNN are you on? > Can anyone try to rebuild the Octave package and let me know > if the segfault during test is present or not in your system ? > > Be aware that build time is very long (~ 4 hours) and requires > a ton of mathematical libraries. > > Any suggestion will be appreciated Should this discussion perhaps be handled on cygwin-apps? We don't always want to advertise just how messy the Cygwin package making sausage factory can be. ;^> I believe the following Cygwin tools and libraries packages, pulled from the package doc build dependencies, and found and filtered using apt-cyg listall, to be sufficient, but may not all be necessary, and should be added to octave.cygport, where it can be used as a build dependency install package list for apt-cyg or setup: DEPEND="autoconf automake bison flex gcc-core gcc-fortran gcc-g++ gperf gnuplot libtool make texinfo libopenblas liblapack-devel libpcre-devel libarpack-devel libparpack-devel libcurl-devel libfftw3-devel libfltk-devel libfontconfig-devel libfreetype-devel libglpk-devel libgl2ps-devel libGraphicsMagick-devel libhdf5-devel libllvm-devel libportaudio-devel libQtOpenGL4-devel libqhull-devel libqrupdate-devel libqscintilla2-devel libqscintilla2_qt4-devel libqscintilla2_qt5-devel libqt3-devel libsuitesparseconfig-devel libsundials-devel zlib-devel" Are there any changes you would make, especially for arpack, OpenGL, qt, scintilla? -- Take care. Thanks, Brian Inglis, Calgary, Alberta, Canada This email may be disturbing to some readers as it contains too much technical detail. Reader discretion is advised. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
