On Sun, May 19, 2019 at 3:44 PM Bob Cochran wrote: <snip> > "Cygwin? this is probably still functional, but now can be considered a > (pre)historic solution."
The words of the ignorant, in my opinion. Cygwin has done an excellent job of maintaining currency and usefulness. <snip> > I would appreciate any feedback on our use of Cygwin for building & > running OpenOCD: https://mindchasers.com/dev/openocd-darsena-windows I think the most important key question to ask is: does it work well for you and your use case? > If fellow Cygwin users think it's a poor use case, then we'll pull the > article. If it works well, I think it is a good use case. -- Erik -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
