On Tue, 26 Feb 2019 18:55:56, "Jerry Baker via cygwin" wrote:
Not really. I don't work for free, especially for hostile people with
over inflated egos and crippling social disorders.
https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/ad-hominem
The onus is on whoever is interested in having cygwin work in this
particular configuration. Clearly not you. Since it works with 2.11, I'm
not particularly interested in expending a lot of work figuring out what
got botched in 3.0 or who did it. Wasn't me, so not my problem.
It was my mistake to assume that the cygwin community was interested in
interoperability. I should have done more research before making that
unwarranted assumption.
it very much is your problem, as im using Windows 7 x64 just fine with Cygwin.
and its your problem else you wouldnt have come here posting. you can start
threads with clickbait titles as youve done, buts its a disservice to the
community when you dont have a reproducible problem. thats why this page has
existed for 5 years:
https://stackoverflow.com/help/mcve
the "V" is Verifiable. and until your example is Verifiable then you shouldnt be
surprised if the "problem" goes unsolved.
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
