Greetings, Heavenly Avenger! > Sorry, problem solved...
> $ cygcheck -c libgs9 > Cygwin Package Information > Package Version Status > libgs9 9.23-1 OK > $ cygcheck -l libgs9 > /usr/bin/cyggs-9.dll > $ ls -l /usr/bin/cyggs-9.dll > -rwxr-xr-x 1 avenger None 11816979 Jun 29 2016 /usr/bin/cyggs-9.dll > Yeah, cygcheck, yeah... (notice 2016 above?) :P > Seems cygcheck -c does not really pokes checksum of every file in the > package? I wonder why this didn't report as corrupt. Checksums change after rebase. > After reinstalling libgs9: > $ ls -l /usr/bin/cyggs-9.dll > -rwxr-xr-x 1 avenger Administrators 12393491 Mar 21 17:58 > /usr/bin/cyggs-9.dll > $ gs --version > 9.23 > Works now. I guess I should just search for 2016 DLLs within /usr/bin > and assume them all as broken, and reinstall the packages. :) > -------- Forwarded Message -------- > Subject: Stubborn ghostscript 9.19 not upgrading to 9.23 > Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2018 22:58:45 -0300 > From: Heavenly Avenger <aven...@avenger.ws> > To: cygwin@cygwin.com > Hello! > I got into this problem that ghostscript refuses to upgrade. > If I try to run a rtf2ps.sh I used to do frequently, I'm getting this: > Looking for the error I see somebody mentioning it should be under > /usr/share/gs/*. I have only /usr/share/ghostscript/*, and it looks like > the same. Therein, I have 9.19 and 9.23 directories, which suggests > there's some leftovers from 9.19. Yet, if I try to find the missing file > (gs_init.ps), I get it within the 9.23 tree. Then it /should/ be good. > Then, moved to /usr/bin and: > $ ./gs --version > 9.19 > $ ls /usr/share/ghostscript/ > 9.19 9.23 fonts > I closed all cygwin terminals, checked up whether no cygwin process was > running, and performed a reinstall of the ghostscript package. It reads > 9.23 in setup_x86_64.exe, so I left a little confuse as to why it is not > getting updated... maybe the package is nuts? Double checked, gs.exe > process is not running nor stuck. > Any ideas about what's going on here? :) I would prefer to be able to > fully upgrade the package, but if the only way is to keep the old one or > do some hacky symlinks, I guess I would need to live with that. :( > -- > Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html > FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ > Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html > Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple -- With best regards, Andrey Repin Saturday, July 21, 2018 12:24:15 Sorry for my terrible english...
