Robert Collins wrote:
Yes -- but I don't maintain the 'arch' or 'subversion' package. I maintain the 'cvs' package. (You're not going to tell me that 'arch'/'subversion' are drop-in replacements for cvs/cvsnt, are you?)On Tue, 2003-01-07 at 01:08, Jason Tishler wrote:On Sat, Jan 04, 2003 at 07:58:48PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote:Because of all that, I'd pretty much decided that the next time I update the 'cvs' package, I'm going to use the cvsnt codebaseWell, there's always Subversion: http://subversion.tigris.org :,)Or arch http://www.fifthvision.net
So, I'll stick with the cvs variants, and leave 'arch'/'subversion' for someone else to contribute and maintain.
--Chuck
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/