This problem is not a generic gcc/gfortran one. If you build the test code on Linux, it works correctly.
Bill On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 10:45 AM, Arjen Markus <arjen.markus...@gmail.com> wrote: > I see I replied to that first message - completely forgot about it. > > I have just tried a bunch of varieties of !GCC$ ... but none seem to > work. Perhaps you should ask on the GFortran list or on > comp.lang.fortran too. > > Regards, > > Arjen > > 2017-01-06 16:26 GMT+01:00 Bill Greene <w.h.gre...@gmail.com>: >> I am encountering the same problem as described in this post: >> >> https://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2015-06/msg00352.html >> >> However none of the responses in this thread indicate whether >> this is a bug or whether there is a workaround. >> >> Can someone kindly provide more information on this issue? >> >> Thanks, >> >> Bill Greene >> >> -- >> Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html >> FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ >> Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html >> Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple >> > > -- > Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html > FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ > Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html > Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple > -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
