From: Herbert Stocker > On 26.08.2016 15:19, Lee Dilkie wrote: > > and break everyone who has existing code to take care of this? > > If it is done, it should be done as an additional option, i'd say.
Of course a new option, duh! ☺ But my feeble brain is failing to imagine a case where this would break anything, unless the user solution would turn a returned foo.exe into foo.exe.exe, which seems doubtful. --Ken Nellis
