> > Maybe the horse has left the barn already but it would have been nice
> > (tm) if these type of symbols were marked in some generic way so that
> > we wouldn't have to keep remembering to extend this table.
>
> I recall commenting on this aspect in a recent binutils thread in the
> cygwin lists, and being told that it didn't matter.
>
What about putting such symbols in another named text section, so that ld would
ignore them ?

Ralf



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

Reply via email to