On Jul 11, 2016, at 2:24 PM, Vince Rice <vr...@solidrocksystems.com> wrote:
> On Jul 11, 2016, at 1:17 PM, Marco Atzeri <marco.atz...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 11/07/2016 18:40, Vince Rice wrote: >> Is there a reason there’s a different version of cvs in 32-bit vs 64-bit >> Cygwin? >> >> 32-bit shows 1.12.13-10. >> 64-bit shows 1.11.23. >> >> (Yes, I know, git forever, but not everyone got the memo.) >> -- > > https://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-announce/2015-07/msg00054.html > > 1.11.23-2 is the last version for both arch > > Regards > Marco Hmmm. Then I wonder how this is true. From my 32-bit VM: C:\>cygcheck -c cvs Cygwin Package Information Package Version Status cvs 1.12.13-10 OK From my 64-bit VM: C:\>cygcheck -c cvs Cygwin Package Information Package Version Status cvs 1.11.23-2 OK Since it’s already installed on 32-bit, I had to run the 32-bit setup in my 64-bit VM to see what the choices were. (The 1.12.13-10 shows up as the “Keep” version on my 32-bit VM’s 32-bit setup.) The one I have doesn’t appear on the spinner, but the package I have installed is clearly valid, and I only get packages from Cygwin (no ports, etc.). Weird. Thanks for info. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
