On 13 June 2016 at 01:35, Ken Brown <kbr...@cornell.edu> wrote: > On 6/12/2016 7:26 PM, Mark McGregor wrote: >> >> ----Ken wrote: >>> >>> I obtained the output in the attachment, which looks good. Are you saying >>> that the message is bogus and no action is needed? >> >> >> Yes. >> ---- >> >> Ok, thanks! It is nice to know than nothing is broken in this respect. But >> it would be also nice to get less bogus messages. > > > Agreed. I took a brief look at the fontconfig code at one point to see if I > could figure out why this was happening, but I didn't succeed and didn't > feel like spending a lot of time on it. > > Ken
I have recently experienced this as well. Some sources (https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/6024 and http://www.mail-archive.com/debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org/msg266900.html) suggest that it is some sort of time stamp related issue? -- VH -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
