Max Bowsher wrote:
Because vague bug reports are all we have. And no-one can reproduce it either.
Frank-Michael Moser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2002-07/msg01745.html] When you investigat that thread you do not find only "vague bug reports".
Max Bowsher wrote:
----------I'm sorry, I didn't remember that thread. You did indeed provide pretty much all the debug information it is possible to provide. It's a shame that this problem is so elusive.
Hi!
I also want to remind you on that thread
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2002-11/msg00881.html
started by me in November about the same topic.
After zoning out a bit about "cygcheck.out" I think I finally also provided all needed information. I get errorcode 0 by the way, not 126.
Unfortunately the problem still exists on my Win2000-Box.
Best regards
Tino
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
