On Dec 21 17:30, Houder wrote: > Hi Corinna, > > For next year !!!!! (posted as a reminder) ... See below.
Next year? Nope... see below. > Regards, > Henri > > 64-%% uname -a > CYGWIN_NT-6.1 Seven 2.4.0(0.292/5/3) 2015-12-21 13:10 x86_64 Cygwin > > 64-%% touch bar.txt > 64-%% getfacl bar.txt > # file: bar.txt > # owner: Henri > # group: None > user::rw- > group::r-- > other:r-- > > 64-%% setfacl -m g:None:rw- -x g:None: bar.txt # add and delete ... > 64-%% getfacl bar.txt > # file: bar.txt > # owner: Henri > # group: None > user::rw- > group::r-- > group:None:rwx <==== surprise! (this one, I did not even specify!) > mask:rwx > other:r-- Heh. I added a mode to allow modify and delete in a single command but didn't actually handle it in the code. I'm sure I tested it at one point... or... at least... planned to test it... uhm... > in stead of the last 'setfacl' command above: > > 64-%% setfacl -x g:None: bar.txt > 64-%% getfacl bar.txt > # file: bar.txt > # owner: Henri > # group: None > user::rw- > group::r-- > mask:r-- <==== uhm, superfluous ... But the same behaviour as with Linux setfacl. You did *not* request to delete the mask, after all. Just uploaded a 0.16 test release to fix the -m/-x... Thanks, Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
