Hi, >> is cygwin's __STRICT_ANSI__ and stdio.h behavior not so compatible to >> glibc's? >> especially, i meant routines in POSIX 1003.1:2001 (popen(), pclose(), etc). >> for a specific example, see a cparser issue[1] i submitted. >> > > Cygwin isn't wrong. __STRICT_ANSI__ doesn't mix with POSIX. > __STRICT_ANSI__ definitions is what you should look at for the defined > API; not POSIX 1003.1:2001.
then why does glibc look accepting -std=c99 -D_POSIX_C_SOURCE=200809L? so you mean linux (maybe glibc?) is wrong and cygwin (maybe newlib?) is right? w/ attached source that uses popen()/pclose() via gcc -std=c99, on cygwin (maybe newlib?), i got, p.c: In function ‘main’: p.c:5:2: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘popen’ [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] FILE *pp = popen("cat", "w"); ^ p.c:5:13: warning: initialization makes pointer from integer without a cast FILE *pp = popen("cat", "w"); ^ p.c:12:3: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘pclose’ [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] int err = pclose(pp); ^ on linux (maybe glibc?), i got, p.c: In function 'main': p.c:4:14: warning: unused parameter 'argc' [-Wunused-parameter] int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { ^ p.c:4:26: warning: unused parameter 'argv' [-Wunused-parameter] int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { ^ ^ Peace, -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple