Corinna Vinschen writes: > What we *could* try to do is to tweak the actual SYSTEM and Admins ACE, > though. Rather than ignoring the CLASS_OBJ/ACL_MASK value completely > for them, we could apply the execute bit part only. Usually it doesn't > make sense for SYSTEM/Admins having execute perms if nobody else has > since it's with high probability no executable file.
I think that would resolve this particular problem and leaves the inherited part of the ACL as is. > Would that make sense? To me, yes. Regards, Achim. -- +<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+ SD adaptations for Waldorf Q V3.00R3 and Q+ V3.54R2: http://Synth.Stromeko.net/Downloads.html#WaldorfSDada -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
