> On Sun, 2015-02-08 at 15:08 -0500, Andrew Schulman wrote: > > As of now, libpng16 requires libpng-doc. Is this a mistake? It seems to > > defeat > > the purpose of splitting the docs into a separate package, since we have to > > install both. And for those of us who are only getting libpng16 because > > it's > > required by another package, we're forced to install libpng-doc too. > > libpng-doc only includes the standard license and README docs, and a > single manpage; it is not an extensive API documentation package. But > it may cause more confusion than intended, so I'll juggle things around > again in -2.
OK. Thanks. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
