On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 03:52:06AM -0800, James Michael DuPont wrote: >Maybe this should be a release criterion?
Not interested. Sorry. >Maybe you don't care if the gcc is fully usable before it is release? GCC *is* fully usable. If you can't build it, use the gcc binary that is provided. As you've probably surmised, I don't have the time or inclination to help other people try to figure out how to build gcc. I have no idea why it would be segfaulting or how to fix it. I suggest debugging the problem in gdb and offering solutions to the appropriate mailing list, which would be the gcc or gcc-patches mailing list in this case. cgf -- Please do not send me personal email with cygwin questions or observations. Use the resources at http://cygwin.com/ . -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
