On Dec 4 10:33, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Dec 3 18:25, Kyle R. wrote: > > On Dec 2 16:52, Corinna Vinshen wrote: > ^^^^^^^ > oops > > > Ouch. The handle in the parent got created non-inheritable. That's > > > bad if the handle is utilized in subsequent child processes which rely > > > on being able to access the handle. > > > > > > I applied a patch and created a new developer snapshot on > > > https://cygwin.com/snapshots/ > > > > > > Please give it a try. > > > > Thanks Corinna, that works perfectly! > > Thanks for testing. And thanks again for providing an STC, that's > very helpful. > > > On Dec 2 14:48, Corrina Vinshen wrote: > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > it's getting worse :) > > > Pity. When I created the locking code I added lots and lots of comments > > > in the hope that > > > > > > a) other people would have a chance to understand how the code is > > > supposed to work and > > > > > > b) *I* have a chance to understand how the code is supposed to work > > > after not looking at the code for a year or longer... > > > > I should mention that I'm only a grad student with more of a focus in > > hardware and computer architecture than softare, so I don't have much > > experience in Linux land yet. Give me a year or so on the job and I may > > be able to understand and debug this kind of code. :) > > Sure, I'd be glad! Only... it's mostly Win32/NT, not Linux code at this > eoint in the source ;)
Weird typo. s/eoint/point/ Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat
pgpGgBXCG_L8G.pgp
Description: PGP signature
